|
October, 2007
Case 213:
A 49-year-old man, with no known travel history, had a colonoscopy.
His physician observed small worms during the procedure that were 3 to 4 mm in length. The worms were submitted to a pathology laboratory
for sectioning and staining. Figures A-C were captured from
hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) stained sections; A was
taken at 100× magnification and B and C were taken at 200×
magnification. Images were sent to DPDx for diagnostic assistance
along with a presumed diagnosis based on the size and morphologic
features. The DPDx Team requested more information on the size of
the oval structures (Figure C, blue arrows) and were told that
they were approximately 50-55 micrometers in length. What
is your diagnosis? Based on what criteria?
 |
 |
|
A |
B |
 |
|
C |
Acknowledgement:
This case was kindly contributed by Dr. R Worthington at Sheboygan
Memorial Hospital.
Click
here for the answer to Case 213.
Case 214:
An 18-year-old woman sought medical attention due to a painful lesion
between her toes. She reported travel to Africa. The
lesion was excised and sent to CDC for closer examination and
identification. The tissue was noted to be fibrous and was
carefully dissected to examine what was inside. Figure A
shows what was revealed within the tissue; the image was taken with
a hand-held digital camera mounted to a dissecting microscope. What is your diagnosis? Based on what criteria?
 |
|
A |
Click
here for the answer to Case 214.
Images presented in the monthly case studies are from specimens submitted
for diagnosis or archiving. On rare occasions, clinical histories
given may be partly fictitious.
|